2026 Global Residential Solar IRR Ranking
We modeled a standardized 6 kW residential system in 30 countries using the same engine behind this site's calculator. The headline: solar return on investment is driven far more by your electricity price and install cost than by how sunny it is.
How to read this ranking
Every country uses identical assumptions so the comparison is apples-to-apples: a 6 kW rooftop system, 25-year life, no loan, no subsidies, 50% self-consumption, and the residential loss preset. Only three things vary by country: local turnkey install cost (per watt), local residential electricity tariffs, and local solar irradiation. IRR is the annualized return; payback is years to recover the upfront cost from bill savings.
| Rank | Country | System cost (6 kW) | Annual generation | Payback | IRR | LCOE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Australia | 7,200 AUD | 9,200 kWh | 3.9 yr | 25.2% | 0.072 AUD |
| 2 | Chile | 5,700 USD | 9,685 kWh | 4.7 yr | 21.0% | 0.057 USD |
| 3 | South Africa | 6,000 USD | 10,169 kWh | 5.0 yr | 19.3% | 0.056 USD |
| 4 | China | 18,000 CNY | 7,263 kWh | 5.2 yr | 18.8% | 0.202 CNY |
| 5 | Singapore | 8,400 USD | 7,748 kWh | 5.2 yr | 18.5% | 0.097 USD |
| 6 | Spain | 6,600 EUR | 8,232 kWh | 5.4 yr | 17.9% | 0.075 EUR |
| 7 | Philippines | 6,000 USD | 8,232 kWh | 5.4 yr | 17.8% | 0.069 USD |
| 8 | Brazil | 27,000 BRL | 8,716 kWh | 5.6 yr | 17.3% | 0.245 BRL |
| 9 | Portugal | 6,600 EUR | 8,232 kWh | 5.6 yr | 17.3% | 0.075 EUR |
| 10 | Pakistan | 3,900 USD | 9,200 kWh | 6.0 yr | 16.0% | 0.045 USD |
| 11 | India | 330,000 INR | 9,200 kWh | 6.3 yr | 15.1% | 2.681 INR |
| 12 | Italy | 8,700 EUR | 7,263 kWh | 6.5 yr | 14.8% | 0.106 EUR |
| 13 | Netherlands | 7,800 EUR | 4,842 kWh | 7.6 yr | 12.1% | 0.146 EUR |
| 14 | Mexico | 6,600 USD | 9,200 kWh | 8.0 yr | 11.5% | 0.067 USD |
| 15 | Germany | 8,100 EUR | 5,327 kWh | 8.1 yr | 11.3% | 0.137 EUR |
| 16 | Thailand | 5,400 USD | 8,232 kWh | 8.3 yr | 10.9% | 0.064 USD |
| 17 | Malaysia | 5,100 USD | 8,232 kWh | 8.4 yr | 10.8% | 0.061 USD |
| 18 | Poland | 6,300 EUR | 5,327 kWh | 9.5 yr | 9.1% | 0.112 EUR |
| 19 | Japan | 1,500,000 JPY | 6,295 kWh | 9.6 yr | 9.1% | 17.743 JPY |
| 20 | France | 9,600 EUR | 6,295 kWh | 10.0 yr | 8.5% | 0.133 EUR |
| 21 | United Arab Emirates | 5,400 USD | 10,169 kWh | 11.4 yr | 7.0% | 0.052 USD |
| 22 | Indonesia | 6,000 USD | 8,232 kWh | 12.5 yr | 6.0% | 0.069 USD |
| 23 | Vietnam | 5,100 USD | 7,748 kWh | 12.5 yr | 6.0% | 0.065 USD |
| 24 | Switzerland | 14,400 EUR | 5,569 kWh | 13.9 yr | 5.0% | 0.215 EUR |
| 25 | Saudi Arabia | 4,500 USD | 10,653 kWh | 15.5 yr | 3.9% | 0.043 USD |
| 26 | United Kingdom | 10,200 GBP | 4,600 kWh | 18.1 yr | 2.5% | 0.192 GBP |
| 27 | Turkey | 5,400 USD | 7,263 kWh | 18.1 yr | 2.5% | 0.073 USD |
| 28 | United States | 18,900 USD | 8,716 kWh | 19.7 yr | 1.9% | 0.176 USD |
| 29 | South Korea | 9,600 USD | 6,295 kWh | 20.0 yr | 1.7% | 0.133 USD |
| 30 | Canada | 18,000 CAD | 6,779 kWh | 24.2 yr | 0.2% | 0.216 CAD |
Sunshine is not the story — price and cost are
The ranking overturns the "more sun = better solar" intuition. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have among the highest irradiation on the list, yet rank 25th and 21st. The reason is simple: electricity there is extremely cheap (around 0.05 USD/kWh), so a rooftop system saves very little per kilowatt-hour. Australia ranks first not because it is the sunniest, but because it pairs strong sun with high retail electricity prices and low install costs. Canada sits last because low irradiation meets high install cost and modest tariffs.
This is why a single global "solar is X% profitable" claim is misleading. The same panels can return 25% in one market and under 1% in another. The quality of the panels matters far less than the local economics.
Why the United States looks low here
The U.S. base case lands near the bottom at 1.9% IRR. That reflects high installed cost and a subsidy-free model. The old 30% federal residential credit should not be assumed for new Section 25D expenditures after December 31, 2025, so a 2026 U.S. homeowner needs to verify state, utility, net-metering, and battery incentives locally. Treat the table as a baseline, not a prediction of any specific homeowner's outcome.
Methodology and limits
- Engine: the same PV Yield calculator model (simulateInvestment) used across this site, with PVGIS/NASA-class weather inputs.
- Install cost and tariffs use indicative residential defaults per country; actual quotes vary widely by state, province, and installer.
- Irradiation is a representative annual value per country, not a site-specific roof assessment.
- No incentives, tax credits, or net-metering specifics are modeled. Adding them changes country order.
- Self-consumption is held at 50% everywhere; higher self-use (common with batteries or daytime load) raises IRR.
These are model estimates for comparison and education, not investment advice. Run your own numbers with local quotes and tariffs in the calculator before making any decision. The embedded ranking below can be reused on other sites with attribution.
Reuse this data
A self-contained, embeddable version of the ranking table is available for publishers: open the embeddable IRR ranking. It is free to embed with attribution to PV Yield.
Explore the drivers yourself: solar panel efficiency, best solar panels 2026, and 2026 residential solar policy. Or jump straight into the calculator with your own roof, quote, and tariff.
Frequently asked questions
Which country has the best residential solar IRR in 2026?
In this subsidy-free model, Australia ranks first at about 25 percent IRR, followed by Chile, South Africa, China, and Singapore. The order is driven by electricity price and install cost more than by sunshine.
Why do sunny Gulf countries rank low for solar ROI?
Saudi Arabia and the UAE have excellent irradiation but very cheap electricity (around 0.05 USD/kWh), so a rooftop system saves little per kilowatt-hour. Solar ROI follows power price, not just sun.
Why is the United States near the bottom here?
The U.S. base case uses high installed cost and no incentives. The old 30 percent federal residential credit should not be assumed for new Section 25D expenditures after December 31, 2025, so local incentives must be verified separately.
Are these numbers investment advice?
No. They are model estimates for comparison using indicative national defaults. Run your own quote and tariff through the calculator before making any decision.